Jen Dalitz
SIGN UP TO RECEIVE NEWS & UPDATES DIRECT TO YOUR INBOX
Little Wins

Latest Posts

  1. New guidelines a valuable resource for gender balance reporting Jen Dalitz 14-May-2013
  2. Thinking of working from home? Work from home DISadvantage suggests it's not all smooth sailing Jen Dalitz 14-May-2013
  3. A tear for our ANZACs and a tear for Kate Jen Dalitz 25-Apr-2013
  4. Women and Leadership: Do women value MBAs as much as men? Jen Dalitz 19-Apr-2013
  5. Steve Jobs on reaching out and reaping the rewards: Fantastic advice from the archives Jen Dalitz 19-Apr-2013
  6. Parenting & Work: Tell the politicians what really counts when it comes to childcare, paid parental leave, early learning and more Jen Dalitz 19-Apr-2013
  7. Invest in your future at the 4th Women on Boards Conference Jen Dalitz 10-Apr-2013

Dog Farm Stays


Women aren’t broken. Law firms are.

Friday, December 02, 2011

A new report by the Law Society of NSW was launched in Sydney yesterday by The Honourable Justice Julie Ward, putting the advancement of women in the legal profession under the spotlight. Unfortunately much of its findings read like another how-to guide for “fixing the women”; whereas very little has been said about the culture and leadership that fails to fully harness the value and opportunity that women lawyers present. 

The report shows that – despite a 451% increase in the number of women solicitors since 1988 and women now comprising almost 60% of all new admissions – one in four young women will leave private practice  within 5 years of admission and fewer than 20% of all partners and principles are women. In other words, there’s no shortage of talented women entering the profession; but the firms where they work have been ineffective in retaining and developing these women into the leadership ranks.

I should say this is in no way intended as a criticism of the President of the NSW Law Society, Stuart Westgarth, and his research team who produced the report and put the gender agenda firmly on the table.   Westgarth in championing this research has raised the bar and is to be commended.

It’s just that the report reads like… well… it reads like it’s been written by lawyers. 

In other words, a lot of careful language is used to describe a complex situation in simplistic terms, without pointing any fingers of blame and so as to avoid any potential embarrassment, liability or unintended offense. 

....................

The report sets no expectations of gender balanced leadership on firms; no targets or definitions of success; and has levelled very little responsibility for improving the status quo.  As such, I would say it’s created a frame of reference (yet again) that it’s the behaviours of women that are letting them down, not the cultures and behaviours institutionalised within their workplaces.

....................

The report shows that in 2010:

  • female practitioners comprised almost 60% of new admissions to the profession;
  • 41% of private practitioners, 54% of corporate lawyers and 63% of government solicitors are women;
  • more young women solicitors are leaving private practice than young men, with one in four new entrants exiting private practice within 5 years; and
  • just under 20% of partnerships in private practice are held by women. 

....................

That this data is now publicly available is an excellent starting point for the legal profession in Australia; the challenge now though is to extend the analysis to more practical depths to drive change, and to get serious about implementing retention and development strategies.

....................

The research methodology in this report overlays the findings of focus groups with some 100 women lawyers and data from the Society’s membership base covering a broad spectrum of data (except for data that doesn’t look particularly good on paper – like the percentage of women in partnerships which I had to calculate myself!) to arrive at 22 tips for practitioners and practices. 

Critically though, the methodology did not include interviews with women who had left the profession or with men who hold 80% of partnership and principal positions, and who, after all, are the ones who decide whether or not women advance in the first place.  I would have to say that conducting focus groups exclusively with women encumbents and asking them to explain why they’re not promoted to leadership roles – in an environment where they have very little control over the process – is a bit like asking the passengers to steer the bus: it’s almost impossible for them to do it when they’re simply not in the driver’s seat. 

And it would be a good starting point for these men to become more engaged in the debate sooner rather than later.  That I counted only 8 men in the 160-seat audience at the report's launch is not only disappointing; it also sends a clear message to the women in the room, whether intentional or not.

Also for a study entitled “Thought Leadership2011: Advancement of women in the profession”, it’s a little disappointing.  Some of the ‘Tips for Practitioners’ read like motherhood statements (Tip 11: “Be brave. Work out what you want and ask for it.” – in my experience women know what they want and that’s why they leave firms – through pure frustration) while others seem to fly in the face of the inherent bias and discrimination many women report to me of life in a law firm (Tip 3.  “Plan ahead for career breaks.  Start talking to your employer early on….” – why would you do this, if it’s likely to put you on the mummy track before you’ve even taken parental leave…)

As for the Tips for practices – these recommendations indicate just how much work needs to be done in the profession.  (Tip 2: “Think about the needs of staff returning to work after career breaks” isn’t going to cut it – you’ll actually need to facilitate seamless offramping and onramping, thinking isn’t enough!)  The report confirms what we already know: women lawyers are flocking to in-house corporate and government roles where they report greater satisfaction with workplace culture and fit – so a good and logical question is what could private practice learn from that?  (Hint re Tip 8: “Consider establishing an in-house mentoring program” – the corporates that are poaching your top talent have been doing this for years…)

This report is definitely worth a read (click here to download as PDF) and a good starting point for further research to build on.  What the legal profession needs to do now is to address the elephant in the room, and really get a grip on why law firms simply aren’t a place that many women can ascend to great heights in their careers. 

My advice to the firms:  The women aren’t broken and don’t need more tips for success; but in the context of gender balance, law firms certainly do.

Christine Lithgow commented on 05-Dec-2011 07:22 PM
Jen, I hope you submit this to the Law Society journal. It is great stuff. (I'd be happy to help out, as this is a topic dear to my heart). Love your blogs, Christine Lithgow
Jen Dalitz commented on 05-Dec-2011 07:33 PM
Great idea Christine... can you please point me in the right direction? If you want to send me the details - email is mail@sphinxx.com.au
Robyn clough commented on 06-Dec-2011 09:28 PM
Great to see the Law Society of NSW confronting this issue. Jen - your comment that "women aren't broken" is spot on. The generic workplace was set up in a different era when the norm was a single income family with one person at home (usually the 'wife').
This isn't terribly relevant in 2011. We need workplaces that recognize dual income families with parenting responsibilities, workers with other carer responsibilities ( eg an elderly parent) and people - men as well as women- who recognize the value of work-life
balance.
Anonymous commented on 07-Dec-2011 10:16 AM
It's great to see some progress by the Law Society in acknowledging this issue and recognising that they might be able to play a part in improving the situation if only by bringing the discussion to the table. I'd like to see the Institute of Chartered
Accountants do something similar. But based on the Tax Forum they held earlier this year where only one of the circa 20 presenters were female I doubt gender equality in the profession is on their agenda at all! I agree with your comments Jen, I hope the Law
Society takes note.
Anonymous commented on 13-Dec-2011 01:55 PM
This is spot on. Good on the NSW Law Society for raising the issues - I hope the points made in this blog get taken on board!
The SheEO commented on 21-Dec-2011 07:27 AM
Robyn and others - couldn't agree more - it's time... I don't know what the Law Society has planned for the future - let's just hope they don't stop now they've come this far.
kathryn kearkey commented on 18-Oct-2012 10:06 AM
Hi Jen
Your comments about the report are incisive. I agree the 2011 Law Society report doesn't go far enough but it is certainly start. Things move so very slowly in the law. The good news is the last week the largest number of women ever (12 out of 26) were made senior counsel (barristers). See the Sex Discrimination Commissioner’s ,Liz Broderick release at http://www.humanrights.gov.au/about/media/media_releases/2012/88_12.html

I am a solicitor who worked for years in the city and then had 3 kids starting at the late age of 39 (which is unbelievably the average age for women lawyers having their first baby). I redirected my career to teaching law and operating a small practice.
I am passionate about ensuring women can use the knowledge and skills to work in their chosen profession and also have a family. So early in 2012 I conceived the idea of, designed and chaired a professional development seminar on the topic of coming back to work aimed at women who were about to have a career break or to coming back. It was well attended. We need more of these and I will run another early 2013.
The fact is there are now 60% women graduating in law and going into practice but the attrition rate is appalling. This is due to many factors, one being the work model is as noted rightly above, the male old fashioned 9-5 M - F and does not fit well raising kids , or caring for elders for that matter.
I am pushing hard to change things but the profession needs to focus more not on the female leaders but in having women actually stay as working lawyer and in decent legal jobs- not all want to be partners or leader. Some just want to go to work, have a good position and work flexibly - not a lot to ask I would have thought in 2012.
Cheers
Kathryn
TheSheEO commented on 18-Oct-2012 11:24 AM
Katherine this is great news - I would love to collaborate in promoting your workshop in 2013 to the network - please stay in touch and if I can provide input or help or simply just spread the word, let me know! Jen
Comments
comments powered by Disqus